Washington Supreme Court Ruling Could Reopen Foreclosure Judgments After Bankruptcy

A recent Mortgage Professional America (MPA) report highlights a Washington Supreme Court decision that could have major implications for mortgage servicers. The ruling in Luv v. West Coast Servicing, Inc. opens the door for lenders and servicers to revisit foreclosure judgments that were previously considered final—especially in cases where state courts have disagreed on how foreclosure laws apply after bankruptcy.

What Happened

The case started with homeowner Prince Eric Luv, who filed for bankruptcy in 2008 and received a discharge in 2009. Nearly a decade later, West Coast Servicing, which had since acquired his loan, initiated a nonjudicial foreclosure. Luv pushed back, arguing that Washington’s six-year statute of limitations had already run out. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals agreed and granted Luv quiet title.

But things got complicated when another appellate case, Copper Creek (Marysville) Homeowners Ass’n v. Kurtz, reached a conflicting conclusion. That inconsistency set up the legal question the Supreme Court just decided: Can a final foreclosure judgment be reopened when the law itself is unsettled?

The Court’s Decision

The Washington Supreme Court said yes—under certain circumstances. The justices ruled that when there’s a genuine conflict in appellate decisions, trial courts may reopen final judgments under Civil Rule 60(b)(11), which allows relief for “any other reason justifying relief.”

In plain terms, that means servicers now have a potential pathway to challenge prior rulings if the law was unclear or contradictory when those decisions were made.

Why It Matters

This decision doesn’t change foreclosure law itself, but it does create new procedural flexibility. For servicers and lenders, it’s a reminder that:

  • “Final” isn’t always final. Judgments may be revisited when the legal landscape shifts.
  • Staying current is key. Conflicting appellate opinions can directly affect enforcement rights.
  • Procedural strategy matters. Knowing when and how to seek relief under CR 60(b)(11) could protect long-term interests.

Share this post :

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Picture of Rachel Williams

Rachel Williams

Rachel Williams is a word wizard and editor extraordinaire, particularly when it comes to the complex worlds of finance, mortgage, construction and design, and mergers and acquisitions. Based in Dallas, Texas, she's not just a master of her craft but also a wife and mom to two awesome sons. When she's not wrangling words or chasing after her boys, you might find her immersed in the latest financial news or brainstorming her next creative project.
Receive the latest news

Gain Access to Exclusive Mortgage Knowledge!

Stay at the forefront of industry developments! By subscribing to MortgagePoint, you’re aligning yourself with the latest insights, updates and exclusive promotions in the mortgage industry. As an industry professional, it’s critical to stay informed and up-to-date. Don’t miss out – subscribe now!